-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New: Add method decorators to AST (fixes #65) #64
New: Add method decorators to AST (fixes #65) #64
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, @JamesHenry! I took a look to make sure it's ready for merging and found some changes are needed:
Can you please update the pull request to address these? (More information can be found in our pull request guide.) |
All in good time, my dear @eslintbot |
Thanks for the pull request, @JamesHenry! I took a look to make sure it's ready for merging and found some changes are needed:
Can you please update the pull request to address these? (More information can be found in our pull request guide.) |
var exp = convertChild(decorator.expression); | ||
return { | ||
type: "Decorator", | ||
loc: exp.loc, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on Flow, we don't need this extra node.
Thanks for the pull request, @JamesHenry! I took a look to make sure it's ready for merging and found some changes are needed:
Can you please update the pull request to address these? (More information can be found in our pull request guide.) |
LGTM |
LGTM |
LGTM |
@nzakas Now ready for review, PTAL |
This looks great, nice work! |
Closes #65
(Ignore the branch name! This PR relates to method decorators)